Pension is an important post-retirement benefit for government employees. A common question is whether the government can stop or withhold pension and…
Case: Gp Capt Prashant Kumar Gupta v. Union of India & Ors., O.A. No. 3484 of 2024 Forum: Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal…
A fourteen-year spotless, without any adverse entry career was disturbed over a motorcycle parked at a railway crossing. The Supreme Court held…
Supreme Court settles the law in Nakhat Singh v. Union of India (2026) The Supreme Court has delivered an important judgment affecting…
The Supreme Court in Union of India v. Parashotam Dass (2023) held that Armed Forces Tribunal orders can be challenged in the High Court under Article 226. Here is what it means for soldiers and veterans, explained simply.
Once the Road Is Chosen, the Traveller Must Walk It to the End: Supreme Court on Discharge, Court-Martial and the Limits of…
Union of India & Ors. v. K Sub Maj (Hony Capt) Mohanraj T.K. W.P.(C) No. 19501 of 2026 | Neutral Citation: 2026:KER:52646…
For Twenty Years, India Punished Paper Leaks With the Wrong Weapon Before June 2024, a paper leak was prosecuted as ordinary cheating,…
SERVICE & CONSTITUTIONAL LAW By Wing Commander (Retd.) Ajit Kakkar, Advocate — Armed Forces Tribunal, Central Administrative Tribunal, Delhi High Court &…
Cashiering is the harshest punishment an Army officer can face — expulsion with disgrace. What it means, how it differs from dismissal, when it takes effect under Rule 168 of the Army Rules 1954, and why a High Court held it can be stayed while the appeal is pending.