Military and Service Law Weekly
This week in military and service law: Kerala HC on investigating officer as Navy court martial prosecutor, AFT quashes censure after 16-year delay, Madras HC on maternity leave and promotion, and more.
This week in military and service law: Kerala HC on investigating officer as Navy court martial prosecutor, AFT quashes censure after 16-year delay, Madras HC on maternity leave and promotion, and more.
Kerala High Court in Union of India v. Santosh Karwade (23 Sept 2026) upholds Regulation 178(3) of Navy Regulations and allows an investigating officer to prosecute the same court martial.
Five recent decisions from the Kerala, Madras, MP and J&K High Courts and the AFT on who may act, when, and in which forum, explained for Armed Forces, CAPF and Government employees.
The Armed Forces Tribunal set aside a censure on a Lt Col after a 16-year, two-COI process, holding unexplained delay vitiated the action and directing promotion review with his batch.
Can the Government challenge an Armed Forces Tribunal order under Article 226 after allowing the statutory appeal period to expire? The Kerala…
Delhi High Court dismisses Union of India’s writ against AFT order granting premature discharge to IAF airman Cpl Hardeep Singh Khalsa – a strong precedent on enforcing Tribunal orders and administrative accountability.
The Armed Forces Tribunal has held that a soldier who won a Silver Medal at the Senior National Rowing Championship cannot be denied his out-of-turn promotion under the Army Sports Promotion Policy because of a delayed NOC. The AFT directed retrospective promotion to Havildar with all consequential benefits and re-fixation of seniority.